First we need to clarify what is meant by the infinite moment.
And we need to know how this differs from infinity in terms of how infinity is currently understood or interpreted.
There is a simple equation which is often put forward to try explain or “quantify” what infinity is, and it goes like this:
∞ = 1 / 0
( infinity = 1 divided by 0 )
To better understand what is being laid out here it is useful to move the equation around to read:
0 = 1 / ∞
In other words, if you divide 1 by the largest number you can possibly think of or compute, then the result of this division will give you a number so close to zero (in everyday terms) that you can for all intents and purposes call it zero, even though, in decimal terms, the tiniest quantity would always feature at the position of infinite decimal places. Try it on a calculator plugging in progressively large numbers which tend towards infinity.
The simple equation is more an equation of “convenience” than something which is true mathematically, because essentially you are told to discard the tiniest quantity for it to make sense. If misused, the equation can greatly mislead, especially once you get into particle physics and quantum theory, where even the tiniest amount is of great significance, and should not be discarded if true scientific outcomes are sought, whether these be through physical or thought experiments.
To first deal with particle physics, to think that an origin point can be found by searching for smaller and smaller subatomic particles is as much a red herring as trying to find the edge of an infinite universe. No matter how large a number you can think of in the above equation, there will always be a larger number, and so the same “quantitative” principle applies in the other direction when getting smaller. When read properly, the above equation actually proves this mathematically, so it is a bit puzzling why particle physicists seem to want to keep smashing particles apart to find “answers”. Again, it’s a mystery to me why it is thought that a destructive act will provide “complete” answers.
Before however assigning this equation to the scrap heap, there is an elephant in the room which nearly every field of “official” science blinds itself to, and that is the “1”.
The “1” represents an intersection point in space and time where things “come to life” as physical matter. At this intersection point there will be a particle which will appear stable though it will constantly flux in such a way that if we were to trace out its “character” through three-dimensional passing time, or “serial time”, it would present as a waveform.
If you are truly interested in quantum physics, then it is the “1” which you need to be focusing on, which we can call the infinite moment. In the infinite moment, time and space are interchangeable terms, but for students of time travel it’s better to think of it as a time unit. There are many such infinite moments. Yes, you’ve probably guessed already, there are infinite infinite moments.
What we are then seeking to enable time travel, and also really what particle physics and quantum theory are seeking, is to find the “middle” of any given infinite moment, any given “1”. In other writings which have endured, this “middle” point is also known as the eye of the needle. In the same vein, if the “1” were shaped like an archery target and we were Robin Hood, we would be looking to split the arrow, as the story goes.
The infinite moment may also be known as the “now” moment, and the key to enabling time travel is to constantly seek out the middle of that “now” moment.
In truth, this is not as difficult as it sounds. You “unconsciously” did it as a child, before your ego function developed, so all you need to do now is to “consciously” remember how you did it, and then practice it, and from that point you should start to notice that your space-time environment that you are perceiving will begin to respond to your new directions of thought, desire and intent.
THE LIVE GAME >>>